Snapped an illegal pic of the Sistine Chapel , Snapped an illegal pic of the Sistine Chapel , https://i.redd.it/azdmi5j09ohb1.jpg , https://reddit.com/r/pics/comments/15p35vn/snapped_an_illegal_pic_of_the_sistine_chapel/ , 1691842722 , https://preview.redd.it/azdmi5j09ohb1.jpg?auto=webp&s=2c7b2e773cec851a5d37246df012ba06f90b7ddb , 15p35vn , i.redd.it , 63901 , aksnndjdis-sjb , , , , , , , aksnndjdis-sjb , 2023-08-12 12:18:42 , no , , Prompt, #Snapped #illegal #pic #Sistine #Chapel, #Snapped #illegal #pic #Sistine #Chapel, 1730424518, snapped-an-illegal-pic-of-the-sistine-chapel


Snapped an illegal pic of the Sistine Chapel

By Diario

29 thoughts on “Snapped an illegal pic of the Sistine Chapel”
  1. “THE SISTINE CHAPEL IS A HOLY PLACE, PLEASE BE QUIET”

    Says the man with the loudspeaker

    “THE SISTINE CHAPEL IS A HOLY PLACE, NO PHOTOGRAPHY ALLOWED”

    Says the man with the body camera.

  2. There’s an interesting story my professor in uni told us about during the painting of the Sistine Chapel. While michelangelo was painting, the pope at the time would try to micromanage what images should go up on the ceiling. The pope threatened that he would replace everything with stars if there was too much nudity. This particular threat angered the master artist who was working hard on the painting. Michael kicked a bucket of paint down from the platforms near the ceiling, almost striking the pope who was looking up at Michael from the ground. A normal person would have probably been sentenced to death for attacking the pope, but because michelangelo was michelangelo, he didn’t receive any punishment and the pope let him continue painting the way he initially intended.

    Not sure how much of that story is true, but I thought it was interesting to hear.

  3. My wife and I had a brief moment alone in the Chapel. We decided to go directly to the Chapel when the Vatican opened, along with many others. We turned a corner just as they were opening a second entrance in. Nobody else seemed to notice and we beat the crowd.

    We had about 1.5 minutes to ourselves.

  4. Fun fact: The reason why it’s not allowed is because back in the 80s, Italy needed to do a restoration and it was really expensive.

    The highest bidder was a Japanese company and with the bid they won exclusive rights for something like 3-5 years to take pictures and video. In school we got to see the high res images and bts stuff.

    Now they don’t have the rights but they still have the ban but arent strict with it so the flashes dont ruin the work again.

    Edit: Yes Vatican city is its own city-state but from what I recall in articles and the Sistine Chapel restoration book/article we read, Italy was involved. Either way a Japanese tv station still bought the rights back then.

  5. Back in 2007, pre-camera phones, i was holding a canon ixus mostly obscured by my long sleeves, hands positioned normally as you would when walking, but the camera aimed up to the ceiling, videoing whatever I can and intended to take screen grabs later. The place was quite crowded too so I tried to blend in. But in under a minute a firm hand was on my shoulder, it was a security guy telling me to quit it. I was like wtf, this must be a done thing, they knew what to look for

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *